WAS JUNIA A FEMALE APOSTLE?
By Ezekiel Kimosop
Romans 16:7 says "Greet Andronicus and Junia, my countrymen and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me." (NKJV).
This text lies in the traditional greetings section at the foot of Paul's Epistle to the Romans.
Does this Scripture suggest that the two Jewish believers mentioned in Paul's greetings were New Testament apostles within the context of Ephesians 4:11?
My view is that being of note among the apostles is evidence of the good standing of the two believers - Andronicus and Junia - among the apostles. They had perhaps excelled in their service to Christ. This text does not suggest or imply that the two had been appointed to apostolic office during the New Testament church period.
Whether or not the two were a Christian couple is difficult to conclusively establish from Scripture. Some scholars consider this as a strong possibility. Kelly Campbell notably observes that the two are not mentioned elsewhere in Scripture. [1]. This considerably limits the reader's reflection on their identity.
It is also instructive that Paul acknowledges the two as having come to faith before him. This suggests that they were perhaps among the first set of New Testament believers identified with the Jerusalem church before the persecution and dispersion that commenced in Acts 7.
John Calvin supposes that Paul may have used the generic name "apostles" to denote apostolic missionaries or "the sent" rather than a reference to the holders of the apostolic office. [2]
Some scholars have supposed that the two may have been siblings who had hosted the apostles in Rome. Others have suggested that the two may have been a Christian couple in Rome. The siblings theory is fairly remote.
We shall now return to the million dollar question: Were the two ministers apostles of Jesus Christ within the context of Ephesians 4:11?
It is instructive that there is no mention of a female apostle in the New Testament Scriptures. Jesus never called a woman into His apostolic team. Besides the appointment of Matthias in Acts 1 as a replacement to Judas Iscariot, no evidence in Scripture suggests that some additional apostles had been appointed by Jesus or by the Jerusalem church. Most Bible scholars agree that Junia was a female Greek name and this strongly refutes the claim on apostolic stature.
Interestingly, Al Wolters observes that Ἰουνιᾶν is the Greek form of the Hebrew male name Yehunni. [3]. This suggests that Junia may have been the Hellenized equivalent of the Jewish male Yehunni. This perspective significantly discounts the possibility that the two were a Christian couple. I would classify it as a peripheral observation.
Daniel Wallace, a leading New Testament Greek scholar disagrees with the view that the two were New Testament apostles. He observes thus in his analysis of Romans 16:7: “In sum, until further evidence is produced that counters the working hypothesis, we must conclude that Andronicus and Junia were not apostles, but were known to the apostles." [4]. This view can be reconciled from a plain reading of the text.
My view is that the two believers were either a faithful Christian couple or prominent Jewish believers known to apostle Paul and other New Testament apostles. The two were residing in Rome at the time Paul wrote the Letter to the Romans.
I am persuaded that neither Andronicus nor Junia was an apostle within the meaning of Ephesians 4:11.
© Ezekiel Kimosop 2026
________________
REFERENCES
[1] Kelly Campbell, "Who was Junia in the Bible and What do we Know About Her?" In "I Believe", iBelieve.com https://share.google/fSA8k2pcbooELFLAs
[2] John Calvin, Acts (The Crossway Classic Commentaries; eds. Alister McGrath and J.I. Packer; Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1995), 237–238:
[3] Albert Wolters, “ΙΟΥΝΙΑΝ (Romans 16:7) and the Hebrew Name Yehunni,” Journal of Biblical Literature 127 (2008): 397–408.
[4] Daniel B. Wallace - Junia Among the Apostles - Double Identification Problem. http://bible.org/article/junia-among-apostles-double-identification-problem-romans-167






