A BIBLICAL EXPOSITION OF ROMANS 9
By Ezekiel Kimosop
Introduction
If one was to rank the Book of
Romans among classes of New Testament Scripture, it would perhaps be listed as the
5th Gospel. This Letter powerfully projects the working of God in
Christ through whom the redemption works were accomplished. It articulates the
works of redemption that are first taught in the gospels. The Book of Romans
was written by a man whose spiritual transformation from a proud defender of
the Jewish religious order to a leading First Century Christian theologian and
missionary is captured in the Bible. Paul defends the purity and efficacy of
the atonement in Christ for the Gentile and the Jew and proclaims that
salvation is by grace alone through faith in Christ. Romans 3:23 is perhaps a
befitting tribute to this great theological treatise. All indeed have sinned.
Gentiles were lost in their spiritual blindness and given to idolatry while
Jews fell out of favor with God when they broke His covenant with them. Both are
desperately in need the salvation in Christ and it is for this reason that Paul
makes a seasoned argument for the solution of the problem of human sin. Christ
alone is the answer!
Paul weaves through the historical covenant
dealings that God had with the Jewish people in order to demonstrate that the
present spiritual position of the nation of Israel arose from their
disobedience.
In the passage of Romans 9 which is
the focus of this exposition, the writer outlines Israel’s calling by God in
the patriarchs and their subsequent disobedience or falling away from God in
rebellion. It outlines the promise of their future return to God through a
remnant that shall be saved.
This letter also speaks to Gentile
believers, reminding them of God’s grace in their adoption in Christ and for
which they should be grateful. Romans 9 has been used by some scholars to teach
the double predestination doctrine that holds that God has appointed a certain
number of people to salvation while hardening the rest to eternal
destruction. They say that God’s
sovereign election of believers was predestined in the same manner that God determined
in advance that Israel would be preferred among other nations of the earth and
that Jacob would rule over Esau. Has God appointed a specific fixed number of
those who will enjoy eternal life will be saved? Has He also appointed the
number of those to suffer eternal destruction to his glory as claimed by those
who subscribe to this view?
This article is dedicated to a
biblical examination of the passage of Romans 9 as read together with Romans
10-11 which conclude Paul’s argument.
A Brief outline of the Passage
Context
In Romans 3 Paul declares that all
have sinned against God and that they can only be justified by faith in Christ.
In Romans 4 Paul picks out examples of Old Testament people who were declared
righteous by God on account of their faith in God. In Romans 5 and 6, Paul
continues with the illustration of the atonement in Christ, the new Adam, who
secures the freedom of the believer from the slavery of sin. In Romans 8 Paul
reveals that salvation is found in Christ alone and that the law was rendered legally
defective the moment Christ was revealed. This passage focuses on the defense
of salvation by grace alone through faith as affirmed in Ephesians 2:8-9. The
writer demonstrates that the life of the believer was transformed from the life
of disobedience because the Holy Spirit guides and illuminates his life. Romans
8 speaks of the new life of the believer and his adoption in Christ into God’s
household and the redemption that awaits God’s creation when Christ is revealed.
It concludes with a brief mention of the sanctification of the believer from
the present earthly life to the glory to come. Chapters 9-11 address the issue
of Israel’s predicament in view of its rebellion. The study of Romans 10-11 is
critical to the contextual interpretation of Romans 9.
Structure of Romans 9
The passage of Romans 9 is
structured along four outlines. Romans 9:1-5 speaks of Israel’s rejection of
Christ. Romans 9:6-13 is dedicated to Paul’s reflection on God’s purpose which
is consequent upon Israel’s rejection of God. Romans 9:14-29 is the largest
passage in this chapter. It speaks of God’s justice and mercy. The final
passage of Romans 9:30-33 relates to Israel’s state of isolation from God by
reason of its rebellion.
The Pain of Israel’s Rejection –
Romans 9:1-5
Romans
9:1-5 says “I tell the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience also
bearing me witness in the Holy Spirit, 2 that I
have great sorrow and continual grief in my heart. 3 For I
could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my [a]countrymen according to the
flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom pertain the adoption, the
glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service of God, and the
promises; 5 of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh,
Christ came, who is
over all, the eternally
blessed God. Amen” (NKJV).
Paul begins with a statement that
conveys his heartfelt conviction that informs his address in this chapter. He
is deeply sorrowful that his Jewish people who had tasted the goodness of the
Lord had rejected Christ. His lament is aptly captured in Romans 9:3 where he
wished he could suffer on their behalf if only that could bring them to Christ.
The people of Israel are identified as the object of God’s grace by which they
were adopted by God as a special people. God made a covenant with Israel which
they repeatedly broke. They were therefore people of divine privilege who
witnessed the glory of God and His great works through their wilderness journey
and yet rebelled against God. Worse even, they rejected Christ, the Messiah
from God who sought to draw them back to God by His sacrificial works of
atonement (v.4). By His incarnate coming, Christ is identified with the very
people who rejected Him. He was least esteemed among the very people who needed
Him most. His divinity and eternity is outlined in verse 5. He is the eternally
blessed God.
Israel’s Rejection and God’s Plan
– Romans 9:6-13
Romans 9:6-13 says “But it is not that the word of God has taken
no effect. For they are not
all Israel who are of
Israel, 7 nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham;
but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.” 8 That
is, those who are the
children of the flesh, these are not
the children of God; but the children of the promise are counted as the
seed. 9 For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come and
Sarah shall have a son.”
10 And
not only this, but
when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac 11 (for the children not yet being born,
nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election
might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), 12 it
was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.” 13 As
it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.” (NKJV)
In this passage, Paul demonstrates
that even though Abraham had two sons, yet God chose the son by Sarah to be the
son of promise. A similar but slightly different paradox emerged in Isaac’s
case. He had two sons by the same mother. Again the second son was chosen to
carry the promise to Abraham. In all these dealings, God continued to work out
His purposes for Israel. In the second case, both sons were of the same seed
and woman. Neither was deserving of election over the other. The choice of
Jacob was purely an act of God’s grace. The quotations in vv. 12-13 were lifted
from Genesis 25:23 and Malachi 1:1-2, respectively. They imply that the younger
son would be preeminent over the older one.
Paul then continues with his
theological treatise that he had developed from the previous passage. In Romans
9:6 he admits that by the grace of God, the Gentiles came to Christ even as the
Jews stayed away in rebellion. Romans 9:11 is often quoted out of context by some
scholars to teach that the believer has no responsibility in his coming to
Christ. This Scripture speaks of God’s foreknowledge rather than a deterministic
control. He knew that Jacob would be born and would take preeminence over his
elder brother. Nowhere in this passage is it taught that God forced Esau to
sell his birthright. We shall shortly revisit this issue in greater detail.
The doctrine of divine adoption was earlier amplified in Romans 8:12-17. Paul recounts the miracle provision of
sons to the patriarchs, Abraham and Isaac (vv. 7-9). This is perhaps a shadow
of God’s provision for the redemption of the church in Christ. Jesus was a Son
of promise who founded the nation of God’s holy people, the Body of Christ.
This model is also mirrored in Genesis 48 where the two sons of Joseph were
adopted by Jacob under what some theologians refer to as “the crossed arms”
adoption. Jacob deliberately gave the birthright blessings to the younger son Ephraim
instead of Manasseh. This was despite Joseph's attempt at correcting the perceived cultural violation.
Some deterministic scholars have argued that the message
of Romans 9:13 is evidence of the operation of predestination election of
believers before the foundations of the world. Such a conclusion does not appear to draw its footing from the teaching of Scripture. Does the fact that God loved (or
preferred) Jacob but hated (despised) Esau affirm the predestination teaching
that believers are chosen and regenerated before they can come to Christ?
We learn from John 6:44 that God calls men to Himself because through the gospel of Jesus Christ. This does not suggest that sinners have no role to play in the salvation process. Genesis 25 reveals that Esau had his
part to play in selling his birthright! Genesis 25:29-34 confirms that Esau
sold his birthright over some stew! Genesis 25:33-34 confirms that
Esau took an oath to sell his birthright to his brother. He violated his moral conscience at the exigency of temporal convenience.
It is important however to
appreciate that the illustrations in Romans 9 were not intended to demonstrate
that God has eternally abandoned those who he despised or glossed over. The
children of Esau would come to the knowledge of Christ in the same way that the
Jews and Gentiles at large would!
There is a part that the believer
should play in accepting the gift of God in Christ. God never forces people
into salvation. He offers men the opportunity to come to Christ. In the same
manner, God never led Adam to fall. He gave him a choice for obedience which he
forfeited by his sinful transgression. This is also true concerning the
election of Israel. They had an opportunity for obedience but they rebelled
against God and broke the covenant with Him. They were scattered to the face of
the earth until Christ.
Israel’s Rejection and God’s
Justice – Romans 9:14-29
14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with
God? Certainly not! 15 For He says to
Moses, “I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have
compassion on whomever I will have compassion.” 16 So
then it is not of him
who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. 17 For the
Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you
up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all
the earth.” 18 Therefore He has mercy on whom He
wills, and whom He wills He hardens.
19 You
will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted
His will?” 20 But indeed, O man, who are you to
reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like
this?” 21 Does not the potter have power over
the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for
dishonor?
22 What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much
longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 and
that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy,
which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even
us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
25 As He
says also in Hosea:
“I
will call them My people, who were not My people,
And her beloved, who was not beloved.”
26 “And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them,
‘You are not My people,’
There they shall be called sons of the living God.”
And her beloved, who was not beloved.”
26 “And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them,
‘You are not My people,’
There they shall be called sons of the living God.”
27 Isaiah
also cries out concerning Israel:
“Though
the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea,
The remnant will be saved.
28 For [b]He will finish the work and cut it short in righteousness,
Because the Lord will make a short work upon the earth.”
The remnant will be saved.
28 For [b]He will finish the work and cut it short in righteousness,
Because the Lord will make a short work upon the earth.”
29 And as
Isaiah said before:
“Unless
the Lord of [c]Sabaoth had left us a seed,
We would have become like Sodom,
And we would have been made like Gomorrah.”(NKJV)
We would have become like Sodom,
And we would have been made like Gomorrah.”(NKJV)
This is undoubtedly one of most
difficult passages authored by Paul. Bible scholars have drawn conflicting
conclusions on its interpretation. Others have relied on the positions adopted
by the Patristic and Reformation theologians. This writer acknowledges this
fact even as we scan through the verses of the passage to find the meaning of
the message.
The Bible affirms in Romans 9:14-16
that Israel was chosen by God’s grace. It is instructive that the same mercy is
later extended to Gentiles in Christ. The mention of Pharaoh’s example in v.17
does not, in my view, suggest that God hardens some people for destruction but
that God can abandon some people to peril when they stubbornly rebel against
Him. God simply abandoned Pharaoh to his fate because he rejected the petition
by Moses who served God’s purposes.
The idea that Pharaoh’s hardening and his subsequent destruction is an illustration of the operation double predestination in Christian soteriology is perhaps overstretched. It should not escape the attention of the reader that Paul is using Pharaoh’s case as an illustration in demonstrating that God had shown mercy to Israel on several occasions and yet they still rebelled against Him. That is the overriding principle in Paul’s entire argument through Romans 9-11. Again, Paul is not teaching a double predestination doctrine in this illustration. He is still focused on showing how favored and privileged Israel was in the eyes of God yet they were undeserving of God’s grace. This is also true of the Gentiles in that God graciously brought them into His fold (Ephesians 2:11-22).
The idea that Pharaoh’s hardening and his subsequent destruction is an illustration of the operation double predestination in Christian soteriology is perhaps overstretched. It should not escape the attention of the reader that Paul is using Pharaoh’s case as an illustration in demonstrating that God had shown mercy to Israel on several occasions and yet they still rebelled against Him. That is the overriding principle in Paul’s entire argument through Romans 9-11. Again, Paul is not teaching a double predestination doctrine in this illustration. He is still focused on showing how favored and privileged Israel was in the eyes of God yet they were undeserving of God’s grace. This is also true of the Gentiles in that God graciously brought them into His fold (Ephesians 2:11-22).
Romans 9:19-21 says “You will say to me then, “Why does He still
find fault? For who has resisted His will?” 20 But
indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say
to him who formed it, “Why
have you made me like this?” 21 Does not
the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one
vessel for honor and another for dishonor?”
This passage carries a second analogy by Paul. He posits a diatribe rhetorical question which he proceeds to answer in vv.
22-23. Some consider his objection as focused on those who do not seek a
sincere explanation on God’s sovereign actions but rather question His
sovereignty. Verse 22 conveys the answer to a sincere question. God is
longsuffering. He was patient with Pharaoh by giving him an opportunity to
accede to the demands of Moses until that window was divinely shut. This also
happened in Noah’s day. Luke 17:27 is implicit of God’s longsuffering (cf.
Hebrews 11:7; 1 Peter 3:20). Notice also that Noah is described as a preacher
of righteousness (2 Peter 2:5). When God’s justice is finally served on the
wicked, the Bible demonstrates that they will have forfeited their opportunity
to repent. This is true of the men of Sodom and Gomorrah. They tuned deaf ears to Lot’s prophetic warning of the coming judgment until it was too little too late (Genesis 19:
14; cf. Luke 17:28-29). They all perished in their rebellion and obstinacy.
I further submit that Romans 9:22 does not demonstrate
that God is actively preparing the vessels for destruction. It is part of a suppositional analogy set out in vv. 22-24. The actor(s) are
not directly mentioned in this context. Instead, the mention of God in v. 23 as actively
preparing men for mercy and for His glory is evidence of his unmerited grace.
Romans 9:24-29 speaks of the
remnant that God would save out of Israel. Again this is evidence of His divine omniscience and foreknowledge. The text does not suggest that God has predetermined a specific
number of Jews to be saved but that through the preaching of the gospel, some
Jews will come to Christ. This regrettably confirms that only a small remnant will believe
the gospel of Christ. This is true concerning Gentiles as well. Paul quotes excerpts
from Hosea and Isaiah to support his argument on God’s grace being extended to
the Gentiles. God's patience and extension of mercy to His rebellious people in Hosea's day was unparalleled. This is equally demonstrated in His unmerited love to Israel in the coming of Christ.
Salvation by God’s Grace Alone –
Romans 9:30-33
30 What
shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue
righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness of
faith; 31 but Israel, pursuing the law of
righteousness, has not attained to the law [d]of righteousness. 32 Why?
Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it
were, [e]by the works of the law.
For they stumbled at that stumbling stone. 33 As
it is written:
“Behold,
I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense,
And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” (NKJV)
And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” (NKJV)
The final passage of Romans 9:30-33
concludes the view that salvation is only by grace through faith. It confirms
that neither the Jew nor the Gentile deserved God’s grace. The last statement
in Romans 9:33 reveals that those who believe in Christ will be saved. This
again underscores the place of human responsibility in salvation (cf. John
3:16-17; Romans 10:5-11). God will be justified and
punishing the wicked who persist in their rebellion.
CONCLUSION
The message of Romans 9 has
demonstrated that salvation is by God’s grace alone. It is not based on
human race or ethnicity or any prior works. Jews and Gentiles will be saved but
some (a large number) will reject Christ. God is not to blame for those who
resist His atonement in Christ. It is by faith that believers are counted as
members of true Israel. Being an ethnic Jew or having received the revelation
of God in Moses was no advantage at all. This concluding statement is amplified
in Romans 10-11 where Paul terminates his argument. Justification in Christ is
by faith alone. Romans 11:32 says “For God has committed them
all (Jews and Gentiles) to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all. It reveals
God’s immeasurable grace; man’s sinfulness and the solution that God has
provided in Christ. God is therefore not responsible for those who reject
Christ. He is justified in His condemnation of sin.
Has God decreed some to eternal life and some to eternal destruction?
Now to answer my question that I posited at the introduction section of this article, my view is that God has not decreed or deliberately appointed some to eternal life and the rest to eternal destruction. Each person has a personal responsibility in responding to God's grace in Christ. Those who hold to the deterministic doctrines teach that God had ordained and decreed ahead of the fall that the twin destinies of men would be in place even before he created Adam and Eve. This doctrine however borders on the conclusion that God is the ultimate author of sin. Why? Because, in their view, God created some sinners for eternal condemnation and is therefore ultimately responsible for their divine destinies.
My view is that God created man sinless and man fell, not by God's decree or determinism, but by man's free will choice in his transgression as taught in the Scriptures (cf. Genesis 2:16-17, 3:1-6). God graciously offered a solution to man's sin in Christ's atoning death and this gift is available to all men who will respond to the conviction of the Holy Spirit at the proclamation of the Gospel. No sinner was assigned to be a reprobate for eternal condemnation. No sinner is "doomed from the womb" as suggested by some! Similarly, no sinner is privileged by reason of having been predestined to eternal life outside the works of the cross. The sinner who hears the gospel proclaimed and is convicted of his sin must make a choice for obedience to Christ or face the consequences of his disobedience. If he rejects God's saving grace in the gospel of Jesus Christ, he is personally liable for his destiny in the lake of fire.
© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020.