Tuesday, December 29, 2020

What Does it Mean that We are Sons of God?

 WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT WE ARE SONS OF GOD? DO WE SHARE SONSHIP WITH CHRIST?

By Ezekiel Kimosop

We (believers in Christ) are sons of God by reason of our spiritual heritage in Christ Jesus as revealed in Scripture (John 1:12, 3:16; Romans 8:12-17). 

Do we share sonship with Christ in every essence?

My view is that the nature of our sonship in Christ is distinct from the Sonship that Jesus shares with God the Father. Jesus is a member of the Holy Trinity by which God has revealed Himself in the Bible. We do not and will never share in that attribute. We are not divine!

There are a number of ways in which this truth is illustrated in the Bible.

For instance, the Bible teaches that Jesus pleased God perfectly for the very reason I have stated above. He had two natures - He was fully God and fully Man at the same time. He was and is without sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). No believer, not even Mary the mother of Jesus, is without sin. 

We cannot attain spiritual perfection on earth even by the exercise of faith. 1 John 1:8-10 illustrates that we simply cannot attain the divine standards. We are merely preserved by God's abiding grace. This is the reason that we ought to confess our sins whenever we appear before the presence of God (Hebrews 4:14-16). 

Secondly, believers cannot share in God's divine essence. We are mortals whose souls have been graciously purchased by Christ's shed blood at Calvary (Acts 20:28-30). We are sealed by the Holy Spirit for redemption (Ephesians 4:30).

Even in the life to come, Jesus will take preeminence as God the Son and we shall eternally be His followers as we dwell in the presence of God forever(see Revelation 2:17). 

The Church is and will be subordinate to Christ in every essence in this life and in the life to come. This is Biblical doctrine.

We cannot therefore please God perfectly on earth because we dwell in sinful bodies which shall perish on death or be transformed into glorious bodies at the appearance of Christ in glory (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, 1 Corinthians 15).

This is not to suggest that we cannot please God or walk in obedience to Him or that we cannot access eternal life because of our imperfections. The Bible guarantees us eternal life on the basis of our union with Christ by faith and in accordance with the teaching of Scripture (John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9). 

We should however shape and qualify our Christian worldview solely under the authority of the revelation of Scripture. No living soul can attain spiritual perfection on earth. That's the point.

I am aware that some charismatic teachers often twist the Scriptures to teach that believers are supermen of sorts who, by the profession of words or the exercise of certain level of faith, can command things into existence! 

The authority given to us by Christ is stated in Matthew 28:19-20. We are to win souls and to teach them kingdom truths so that they may grow in the knowledge of Christ (cf. Ephesians 4:11-15) and transfer the mantle of the gospel from one generation to another through faithful men (2 Timothy 2:1-2). 

We were not called to be miracle workers or to multiply money. We are stewards of the mysteries of God by the proclamation of Christ. We are therefore required to preach Christ crucified (1 Corinthians 1:23, 4:1-2) and to await His soon return in glory.



Monday, November 30, 2020

What Does it Mean that We were Dead in Sin?

WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT WE WERE DEAD IN SIN? 

By Ezekiel Kimosop

THE FALLEN STATE OF THE SINNER

Following the fall of Adam, man was immediately separated from God. This is the condition contemplated by Scripture when it metaphorically describes sinners in Ephesians 2:1,5 as spiritually dead. 

Contrary to the teaching of the Total Depravity doctrine advanced by five point Calvinism, being dead in sin does not imply that the sinner is utterly depraved to the point that he is morally incapable of hearing or responding to the gospel when proclaimed to him in truth. It simply means that the sinner in his fallen condition is separated from God and is helpless without the redemption in Christ. 

The gospel of the cross conveys the only cure for the sinner in his fallen state. It contains all the divine ingredients for the purpose. It is sufficient. There's nothing to be added, not even any prior spiritual surgery on the sinner! 

The word of God is described in Hebrews 4:12 as sharper than any two edged sword. It cuts through the sinners heart, no matter how depraved or wicked he is. It will draw the sinner into conviction.

The truth is that as a result of the fall, all men in all ages since Adam have come short of God’s glory and need to be restored to God through the atoning grace in the gospel of Jesus Christ (Isaiah 53:6, Ephesians 2:1, Romans 3:23, Romans 5:12, Ecclesiastes 7:20). Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. 

Our spiritual separation from God in Adam came with dire consequences. Adam did not die physically the day he disobeyed God. He lived on to 930 years (Genesis 5:3-5). Scripture doesn't say how long Eve lived after the fall but she possibly lived for a comparatively long period!

The Hebrews are a patriarchal society where little mention is made of women except those who are prominent. 

Scripture is explicit that both Adam and Eve suffered spiritual death and were instantly separated from God the moment they disobeyed God. This is in accordance with the teaching of Genesis 2:15-17, 3:2-3. 

Adam therefore instantly lost his fellowship with God the moment he disobeyed Him and was shut out from God's holy presence. His expulsion from the Garden of Eden in Genesis 3:22-24 is instructive of his falleness.

GOD'S SOLUTION TO MAN'S FALL

Man's condition of rebellion could only be cured by the redemption that God provided in Christ at the cross of Calvary. This is the foundation of our hope in Christ that Scripture alludes to in Genesis 3:15. Without the works of cross, the Christian faith would be incomplete.

The gospel of Jesus Christ grants us the ability and the means by which we receive cleansing and restoration to fellowship with a holy and righteous God. This is the exclusive way to God that lies at our disposal while Christ tarries. The Bible says in 1 Timothy 2:5-6 "For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time."

If God left man to himself, he would have continued in sinful condemnation and perished but glory to God that He did not leave us to ourselves. We can rejoice with Abraham that God has indeed provided the Lamb for our atonement! (See Genesis 22:14). He has sent His loving and gracious appeal to us in the gospel of Jesus Christ that directs us to the cross of Calvary where we receive God's gracious pardon for our sin (Acts 17:27, Romans 10:17, 2 Corinthians 5:20, John 20:31, John 12:32)

Now that God has enlightened us through His revelation in His word, the sinner can receive Jesus Christ and be spiritually restored to fellowship with God (John 1:12, Acts 16:31, Romans 10:9, Romans 10:13).

If the sinner persistently rejects the gospel, he can potentially become hardened; ever seeing but not perceiving, ever hearing but not understanding. 

The sinner who persists in his rebellion against God can be given over to his reprobate mind. This does not imply that God hardens the sinner for destruction. It is the sinner's intransigence that takes him further and further away from God! 

If the sinner ultimately perishes, having heard and rejected the gospel, he will do so because he refused to love the truth and so be reconciled with God. (John 3:36, 2 Thessalonians 1:8, 2 Thessalonians 2:10, Acts 28:27, Romans 1:28).

CONCLUSION

We have learned from this article that we all fell under sinful condemnation in Adam until God mercifully reached out to us in Christ Jesus. We have also discovered from the teaching of Scripture that God is still reaching out to every sinner through the gospel of Jesus Christ. 

This window of opportunity will be closed when the sinner dies in unbelief or when Jesus Christ returns to take away His Church.

Any doctrine that contradicts the authority of Scripture concerning the gospel is false. The Bible is the sole and exclusive authority for Christian doctrine. It should inform our faith and practice and shape our theological worldview.

The Bible nowhere teaches that God ordained and hardened some sinners for destruction in hell for His glory! He never created some for eternal life in Christ while deliberately consigning others for eternal damnation in hell. 

God, by means of the cross, desires that no sinner should perish in disobedience (John 3:16).  It is upon every person who hears the gospel today to turn to God for forgiveness of sin. There's no other way to God beside Christ.

Have you been to Jesus for the cleansing blood? 



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020


Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Dealing with Moral Depravity in a Covenant Community: Lessons from Ezra 9

DEALING WITH MORAL DEPRAVITY IN A COVENANT COMMUNITY: LESSONS FROM EZRA 9

By Ezekiel Kimosop

INTRODUCTION

Today's study focuses on Ezra 9. You may perhaps recall that during our study of Ezra 7-8, we learned that Ezra was a priest and a scribe. He was among those who were taken into captivity during the fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar in 586BC.

The first group of returnees that was led by Zerubabbel left for Judah in 538BC. The focus of their ministry was the reconstruction of the Jerusalem temple which had been destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar. This team faced lots of resistance from the enemies of God's people  and the works were intermittently stopped but the temple works were finally completed and the temple was dedicated (Haggai 1-2; Ezra 5-6).

Given his access to the royal courts, Ezra was perhaps a high ranking official at the imperial courts in Persia. He had a personal vision to serve God's people. He sought to study and to teach God's word to a society that had forgotten God's ways. Ezra was passionate about his calling (Ezra 7:10).

The journey to Jerusalem took four months on foot (Ezra 7:9). Ezra could have accessed royal military horsemen and chariots but he chose to trust God for protection, having confessed His faithfulness (Ezra 8:22-23). Ezra's journey is described in greater detail in Ezra 8:15-36.

MORAL DECAY IN JUDAH

In Ezra 9, the man of God was confronted with a reports that broke his heart. His society was steeped in moral corruption. They had intermarried with the heathen Canaanite people in violation of God's command to Israel. This was perhaps just the tip of the iceberg. There could have been worse tales of moral excesses that were not captured in the passage! 

Ezra broke down in the presence of God and mourned for a full day. tearing the robe and plucking hair and beard demonstrated great sorrow (9:3).

He took time to absorb the shock and to internalize the scope of the moral corruption in his society. Notice the impact of his reaction on those among him who trembled at God's word. They joined Ezra in mourning (9:4).

This sad situation drove him to the second stage; the action point. This is a critical step for every child of God who is burdened by grief.

EZRA'S PRAYER

Ezra sorely wept before God because the burden in his heart was unbearable. Notice the structure of his prayer. The first portion is dedicated to the corporate admission of sin. Ezra identified himself amongst his fallen society as he outlines the depth of sinfulness which preceded the captivity period and incorporated the kingship era. 

The sin and rebellion of the people had pervaded the entire society including the priesthood of which Ezra was part (9:6-7). He acknowledged the window of grace by which God permitted the returnees back to Judah (9:8) and the fact that God graciously sustained them through the captivity period (9:9). 

In Ezra 9:10-14, Ezra now turns to the gist of his petition. He recognizes the agony of the sin and rebellion of his people and pleads for God's unmerited grace for them. 

Ezra pleaded with God to spare the people from His holy wrath. He perfectly understood the import of God's wrath on a society given the captivity experience he suffered in Babylon and Persia.

Ezra's prayer spills into Ezra 10:1-2 where its impact on the gathering is recorded. 

MORAL LESSONS 

We learn from this passage of Ezra 9 that no one is immune to moral depravity, not even the religious class. When a covenant community strays from the paths of God, it is only a matter of time before they fall into moral ruin. Their spiritual alertness is progressively numbed by the enemy as they slide into disobedience.

We also learn that it takes the pain and conviction of an individual to lead a community to revival. A lost society can only be led back to the beaten path by men of conviction who drive them back to the old religion of truth that they had forsaken. 

Revival therefore begins with a single individual who is sick and tired of the wickedness and rebellion in his community of context and who is brokenhearted even as David was (Psalm 51:10-17). His weeping will never be in vain.

This passage also speaks to ou fallen society of today. Just the other day we were confronted as a nation with media reports of teenagers who engaged in orgies in the name of birthday celebrations in a home. These teens were completely oblivious of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic and the scorch of teenage pregnancies in Kenya. I won't be surprised to learn that some of these teenagers are from our Christian homes, children that we raised in Sunday school but who have taken the path of moral ruin.

The global media revolution has brought with it a curse on our modern society. Internet porn and narcotic sites are fast sellers among our young people today.

On the flip side, our political class is gripped with insatiable greed for power and many would do anything to gain or control political influence even at the expense of the economic and social wellbeing of the country. Some are totally immune to the suffering of the common folk.

This is evidence of a rotten society where the James Bond movie slogan "Live and Let Die" appears to aptly resonate. We have sunk so low such that the moral voice of the Church and the religious class at large has been muffled and ignored on matters of national importance.

Ezra chose to take radical steps in seeking a solution for the moral decay in his society. He believed that God's powerful hand would break the moral decay. He began with God and finished with God. Unless we begin with God, we won't overcome the troubles afflicting our families and society at large. Christ is the answer to our depraved world.

Are you perhaps lamenting about the societal decay around you? Begin with personal spiritual revival! Weep for your family, your neighborhood, your nation that God may restore us from the moral slide.

Prophet Jeremiah was grieved by the moral depravity in his society. He quips "My eyes bring suffering to my soul Because of all the daughters of my city" (Lamentations 3:51).

CONCLUSION

Jeremiah wept; Ezra wept; Nehemiah wept; Esther wept; Daniel wept. There are countless other men and women of God who stood out in their day and touched the heart of God. Finally, and most significantly of, Jesus wept...

We too should weep for the daughters of our Jerusalem of context, our fallen nation; the very people among whom we dwell. Don't wait for a large group to gather around you in order to weep. Start right where you are.

God is looking for the Ezra's of today, the Jeremiahs, the Daniels, you and I to stir up the spiritual and moral revolution. Just as happened in Ezra's prayer, others will catch up the burden and they too will pray. 

God laments in Ezekiel 22:30-31 saying "So I sought for a man among them who would make a wall, and stand in the gap before Me on behalf of the land, that I should not destroy it; but I found no one. Therefore I have poured out My indignation on them; I have consumed them with the fire of My wrath; and I have recompensed their deeds on their own heads,” says the Lord God."

We should arise and take our positions while the window of God's grace remains open, before God shuts the door as He did in the days of Noah (Gen. 7:16). 


#####

Our next lesson will be drawn from the study of Ezra 10. We shall learn about the impact of Ezra's prayer on his immediate community and the steps that he took in addressing the moral decay. 


Shalom



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020


Sunday, November 22, 2020

How to Resolve Conflicts among Believers

HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS AMONG BELIEVERS

By Rev James Njehia

INTRODUCTION

For as long as we dwell in the fallen bodies, conflict is inevitable. No believer is immune to conflicts. We all fail others in one way or another during our congregational duties.

When conflicts are not resolved in time, they eventually weaken the communion or fellowship of the congregation.

How do conflicts arise?

1) When a believer does or says anything that is inappropriate whether intentionally or inadvertently.

2) When the believer fails to do what is required of him or her. 

We should harness our strengths and weaknesses to resolve conflicts at the earliest opportunity.

CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE

How should we resolve conflicts in a Biblical way? 

Matthew 18:15-20 outlines the steps for resolving inter-Christian conflicts. 

Christian conflicts in a church community fall into two categories, namely inter-congregational conflicts and leadership related conflicts. 

How we approach one another during conflict resolution matters. We need tact and wisdom in order to avoid accelerating the conflict.

The first step is for the offended party to approach their offender with love and explain the case. If the offender admits his inadvertence, the matter is privately resolved. 

In Matthew 18:16, we notice from the words of Jesus that certain conflicts may not be resolved at the first instance.

Some offenders may refuse to admit their fault often because of their pride and spiritual immaturity.

Again this depends on the nature of offense in question.  

In this case, the offended party should involve other mature, faithful and nonpartisan believers who should patiently hear both parties and judge on the matter with prudence and impartiality. They should never take sides on the conflict.

This exhortation is consistent with the teaching of Deuteronomy 19:15 which speaks of the involvement of two or three witnesses in communal conflict resolution procedure among the children of Israel.

The third step outlined in Matthew 18:17 is to refer the conflict to the Church if it fails to be resolved at the second instance. This is contextually understood to involve the congregational leadership who will hear the matter on behalf of the church. In this way, the privacy of the patties is protected.

If the offender defies the verdict of the church leaders, he or she should be suspended from the church fellowship or communion and be subjected to church discipline in accordance with established procedure. 

In 1 Corinthians 5:5, we notice Paul's verdict relating to the moral sin in the Corinthian congregation. It was reported to Paul that the offender slept or cohabited with his stepmother, an immoral act that was not acceptable even among the pagan society of the day. 

The believer apparently continued in fellowship with the church despite the sinful act! It appears that the church leadership was aware of the offense but seemingly overlooked it until the Apostle provided spiritual direction on the matter (cf. 1 Corinthians 5:2-5). The man was finally suspended from fellowship. 

Once an offender is removed or suspended from church fellowship, he is likely to lose the joy of salvation (Psalm 51:12). This is not to suggest that he ceases to be a believer. 

If he was a congregational leader, he ceases to exercise the functions of his office at that point. This is to avoid conflict of interest and to help him focus on his spiritual restoration.

LESSONS FROM THE CORINTHIAN CASE

Some conflicts such as the Corinthian case arise from the conduct of the believer with people outside the congregation. In the Corinthian case, the spiritual status of the step mother is not identified. It is safe to assume that she was not a believer. 

During his suspension on church discipline, the offender should demonstrate remorse and the fruit of repentance before he can be restored back to fellowship (cf. Psalm 51:10-17; 2 Corinthians 2:3-11). 

The primary purpose for church discipline is restoration rather than alienation of the believer. 

In 2 Corinthians 2:3-11, Paul appears to be referring to the offender mentioned in his first letter. In the Corinthian case, the believer was apparently suspended for unnecessarily too long and this would have injured the offender's faith had Paul not intervened (see 2 Corinthians 2:6-11). 

Paul appeals to the Corinthian congregation to forgive the offender and restore him to fellowship. Some Bible commentators say that the incident had possibly tainted the standing of the congregation because of the protracted approach taken.

Other commentators however say the two incidents may be unrelated since there's nothing expressly negating the possibility that the second incident was a separate case.

Most Bible commentators however agree that the two accounts refer to the same incident at different stages.

RESOLVING LEADERSHIP RELATED CONFLICTS

Some church conflicts may involve congregation leaders. In this case, the Bible teaches that charges against elders or pastors should be established on the testimony of two or three witnesses (1 Timothy 5:19-20). This procedure is intended to protect them from malicious accusations by those opposed to their leadership.

Once the offense is established, the offender should be openly rebuked in the congregation so that others may fear.

There are however civil and criminal offences that may require the involvement of the state authorities. For instance, allegations on serious crimes such as theft or physical violence should referred to the law enforcement agencies even as church discipline is considered. 

Every believer should submit to the authority of his congregational leadership during the resolution of conflicts and when under church discipline. They should be willing to admit and confess their offences in the fear of the Lord at first instance so that they are expeditiously resolved. 

Those who are offended should on their part be willing to forgive their offenders who seek forgiveness for their offences. This is evidence of spiritual maturity. We should always remember that no believer is  perfect. We should learn to apologise when we offend others by our acts of commission or omission. 

In this way, our Christian communities will remain strong and grow in spiritual maturity in the knowledge of Christ [cf. Ephesians 4:11-16].


]Rev James M. Njehia is senior pastor, AIC Wilson Airport, Nairobi]. 


© Ezekiel Kimosop Teaching Series 2020


Friday, November 6, 2020

The Need for the Gospel - Lessons from Romans 10:1-13

THE NEED FOR THE GOSPEL - LESSONS FROM ROMANS 10:1-13

By Ezekiel Kimosop

Do you sense the need for a faster approach to the taking of the gospel to the lost among the people of this world? This article examines this need and urgency in the context of the message of Romans 10:1-13. We begin with the study of text and conclude with the evaluation of its message.

TEXT

10 Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may be saved. 2 For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. 3 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

5 For Moses writes about the righteousness which is of the law, “The man who does those things shall live by them.” 6 But the righteousness of faith speaks in this way, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’” (that is, to bring Christ down from above) 7 or, “‘Who will descend into the abyss?’” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). 8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith which we preach): 9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. 13 For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

BACKGROUND ANALYSIS

This passage is part of Paul's long argument that started in Romans 9 and terminates in Romans 11. Paul made a spirited argument to the Church of Rome, a Christian community that consisted of Jewish and Gentile people.

Paul speaks to both communities but more so his native Jewish people who had rejected the gospel. In Romans 3:23 Paul declares that all have sinned and fall short of God's glory and hence the need for a savior. Later in Romans 5:8, Paul recognizes the divine solution to human sin which God graciously offered to us in Christ. He says "... God commended His love towards in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." In Romans 6:23, Paul speaks about God's justice for sin and its solution in Christ. He says "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus."

Christ's atonement completely frees the believing sinner from God's condemnation in Adam and ushers in a new life of obedience in Christ (Romans 8:1-2; cf. 2 Corinthians 5:17). The believer is granted sonship and adoption into God's household and is entitled to God's heritage in Christ (Romans 8:12-17). Paul states that our Christian suffering in this world is temporal as compared to the glorious hope that awaits us in Christ when He is revealed (cf. Titus 2:11-14; 1 Peter 1:6-12). Meanwhile God is preserving His saints and building them in Christ through sanctification in order to conform them to the image of His Son (Romans 8:18-30)

In conclusion, we can observe that Paul took time to describe not only the depravity of sin but the power of the cross in bringing victory over it and the newfound life of victory, hope and joy in Christ Jesus.

ISRAEL'S NEED FOR A SAVIOR

Having laid the foundation for his argument, Paul then turns to his Jewish community in Romans 9. In this long thesis, Paul laments over Israel's rejection of Christ. His pain is revealed in Romans 9:1-5. The Israelites had done the unthinkable; they rejected God's grace in Christ even though they were enlightened through God's election of them as a special people (Romans 9:6-13). 

God was patient with Israel despite their rebellion. He provided Jesus as Israel's seed through whom their redemption would come. Unfortunately, the Jews still rejected Him. Meanwhile, God reached out to the Gentiles and brought them into His fold even as He longed for Israel's return to Him (Romans 9:22-33; cf. Ephesians 2:11-18). 

BACK TO THE PASSAGE OF CONTEXT

This brings us to our passage of context of Romans 10:1-13 where Paul argues about Israel's need for the gospel. This rallying call is definitely not restricted to Jews alone. It is a Macedonian, so to speak, that underscores the yearning for a savior among the global Gentile communities that have not been reached with the gospel. It should therefore inspire our evangelical effort in taking the gospel to the dying world within our reach.

The Jews were lost in their self-righteousness in the law which was not effective in justifying them before God. Hebrews 10:1 says “For the law, having a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with these same sacrifices, which they offer continually year by year, make those who approach perfect. The law of Moses was merely a shadow of things to come when Christ, the Passover Lamb of God will be slain ass the perfect atonement for those who will believe the gospel. This was fulfilled at Calvary more than 2000 years ago.

Paul says that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4). What does this mean? Christs death and resurrection brought to a close or fulfilled and superseded the ritual sacrificial system outlined in Moses. Christs atonement was the ultimate object to which the law pointed. In Romans 10:5-13, Paul outlines the procedure by which the sinner should come to faith. They should accept God's atonement in Christ and place their faith in Christ (Romans 10:8-10).

Paul's closing statement in Romans 10:12 is instructive of the universal offer of God's atonement in Christ. It is meant for the Jews and the Gentiles alike. 

CONCLUSION

This message of Romans 10:1-13 should inspire our Christian witness to unbelieving communities or people around us. It provides the assurance that God's grace in Christ is intended for all humanity irrespective of their ethnic, racial and geographical distinctions. God is still calling on all men to come to Christ while the window of God's grace remains open. We should not tire in presenting and articulating the gospel to those in our communities of context. The need for the Gospel is perhaps of greater urgency now than it was 2000 years ago because Christs coming and the conclusion of human history as we know it is closer and closer.  

Do you and I share in Paul’s affliction of heart concerning the urgency and necessity of the gospel? 







Thursday, October 22, 2020

My Response to a TULIP Calvinist

 MY RESPONSE TO A CALVINIST

By Ezekiel Kimosop

INTRODUCTION

This article was written in response to a rejoinder to my previous article by a Calvinist who posted the following comment on my Facebook page:

######

READER'S COMMENT

Total Depravity - As a result of Adam’s fall, the entire human race is affected; all humanity is dead in trespasses and sins. Man is unable to save himself (Genesis 6:5; Jeremiah 17:9; Romans 3:10-18).

Unconditional Election - Because man is dead in sin, he is unable to initiate a response to God; therefore, in eternity past God elected certain people to salvation. Election and predestination are unconditional; they are not based on man’s response (Romans 8:29-30;9:11; Ephesians 1:4-6, 11-12) because man is unable to respond, nor does he want to.

Limited Atonement - Because God determined that certain ones should be saved as a result of God’s unconditional election, He determined that Christ should die for the elect alone. All whom God has elected and for whom Christ died will be saved (Matthew 1:21; John 10:11; 17:9; Acts 20:28; Romans 8:32; Ephesians 5:25).

Irresistible Grace - Those whom God elected He draws to Himself through irresistible grace. God makes man willing to come to Him. When God calls, man responds (John 6:37, 44; 10:16).

Perseverance of the Saints - The precise ones God has elected and drawn to Himself through the Holy Spirit will persevere in faith. None whom God has elected will be lost; they are eternally secure (John 10:27-29; Romans 8:29-30; Ephesians 1:3-14)

#######

MY RESPONSE

Here's my response to the readers comment:

TOTAL DEPRAVITY

Salvation is not and has never been about man saving himself. Your assertion is therefore unnecessary and misleading. The issue is about whether or not the sinner can hear the gospel and respond to it willingly, consciously. You left out that part. You rebuttal, if intended, therefore fails. I stand by my view that the Total Depravity doctrine, in so far as it denies the sinner's ability to respond to God's grace, is unbiblical.

UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION

There's no evidence from Scripture to support the Unconditional Election doctrine. According to Scripture, salvation comes through God's grace and is conditional to the sinner's response (John 3:16). God cannot forcibly save anyone. See my website article. 

You have simply cited proof texts without outlining how they support your doctrine. Your mention of Gen 6:5 ignores Gen 6:8. Noah found favor with God despite the wickedness in his generation! He was obedient to God and therefore pleased God. The concept of Unconditional Election as outlined by Calvinism is false and misleading. 

Jeremiah 17:9 should be read together with Jeremiah 17:10. You have not demonstrated how this Scripture supports the Unconditional Election doctrine. 

I can state with confidence that this doctrine is not supported by any passage of Scripture.

LIMITED ATONEMENT

I have addressed this fallacious doctrine in my website article whose link was shared on my Facebook teaching page. 

Now to respond to your citations:

Matthew 1:21 does not refer to the "Elect". Jesus is referring the Jewish people in that context. None of the rest of the Scriptures cited affirm the Limited Atonement doctrine.

Here's why...

The sheep mentioned in John 10:11 are not the "Elect" contemplated by Calvinism. Jesus was speaking about those among the Jews who had obeyed His voice as opposed to the Pharisees who resisted His message and opposed His works. 

The context of the statement in John 10:11 stretches back to the healing incident in John 9 that stirred up the discourse.

John 17:9 doesn't refer to the Calvinistic "Elect" but to all who will come to faith in Christ through the preaching of the gospel. This is equally true of the flock (Acts 20:28); those who are the called (Romans 8:28-32) and the Church (Ephesians 5:25). 

IRRESISTABLE GRACE

There's no single reference to the doctrine of Irresistable Grace in Scripture! The Bible only contemplates the conviction of the sinner when the gospel is proclaimed in truth (cf. Hebrews 4:12).

John 6:37 refers to those who will come to Christ by faith. This Scripture does not support the double predestination theory advanced by Calvinism.

John 6:44 - God draws men to Himself through the preaching of the gospel and by no other means. This is true of John 10:16 as concerns the other [futuristic] sheep which are not of the immediate fold [Jewish believers] that Jesus had drawn to Himself at this point in time. 

The concept of Irresistable grace is an alien and abstract philosophical construct exclusive to Calvinism. It is a false teaching; a plain heresy intended to justify the purported election of a special group of sinners ahead of Calvary to the exclusion of others. 

PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS 

Yes God preserves those He calls or draws to Himself through the preaching of the gospel and who individually respond to the gospel. However, so long as the "elected saints" contemplated in this doctrine refers to the philosophically abstract group taught by Calvinism, this doctrine is decidedly false and misleading. 

CONCLUSION

The Calvinistic/Reformed systematic premised on the TULIP is heretical. It is neither Christian or Biblical in substance. 

God has not preserved a group of sinners for eternal life to the exclusion of others! 

All sinners in all ages can hear the gospel when proclaimed and accept or reject it. Adam heard the voice of God in the Garden of Eden even after he fell! In his guilt, he hid from the presence of God but God graciously sought him. 

The gospel is sufficient to reveal to the sinner his fallen condition and to convict him of his guilt and his need for a savior.

Calvinism denies this truth because it stands in the way of their false doctrines.

In conclusion, my view is that TULIP Calvinism is a false systematic that reads philosophical suppositions into Scripture. Its authority lies outside Scripture. It cannot be embraced by a Bible believing and discerning Christian without first denying the fundamental truths taught in the word of God.


© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020




Why I Consider TULIP Calvinism Unbiblical

WHY I CONSIDER TULIP CALVINISM UNBIBLICAL

By Ezekiel Kimosop

TULIP is an acronym that stands for the five point doctrines embraced by Calvinism or Reformed Theology. 

It is spelt out under the following outlines:

Total Depravity

Unconditional Election

Limited Atonement

Irresistable Grace

Perseverance of Saints

Each of the five doctrines is independently outlined but they are closely related. The Total Depravity doctrine is the central or pivotal doctrine on which the others stand. If it is theologically demolished, the next three doctrines would accordingly collapse! This is basically what this article seeks to prove.

Five Point Calvinism teaches as follows (summarized):

1) TOTAL DEPRAVITY

1) According to Calvinism, a sinner [a person outside Christ] is so dead in sin that he is morally incapable of responding to the gospel unless God first and causatively regenerates his heart after which he is enabled to believe in Christ. 

Calvinism denies the libertarian free will of the sinner who is considered totally depraved and irretrievably lost in sin such that he is unable to make a moral decision for obedience to Christ.

My view is that this doctrine is false for a number of reasons. I will outline two below: 

First, there's no evidence in Scripture that God forcibly chooses anyone against their will. Each sinner must willingly accept or reject the gospel when proclaimed to them. The choices have clear consequences that are taught in the Bible. To deny this truth is to reject the revelation of the word of God.

Secondly, Ephesians 2:1-10 which is the bedrock of this doctrine contains several metaphors and figures of speech that cannot be literally rendered without distorting the passage context and the harmony of  the entire body of Scripture. 

Paul's reference to the sinner being dead in sin (Ephesians 2:1,5) is, in my view, a metaphorical reference to the sinner's spiritual condition in which he is alienated or separated from God by reason of the sin in Adam. It does not imply that the sinner is unable to hear the gospel preached or make a moral choice for obedience.

2) UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION

This doctrine says that God chose some among sinners and predestined them to be saved without any condition on his part or on their part. According to Calvinism, the chosen few did nothing to merit their salvation, not even exercising faith in Christ! They were passively involved in the entire process!

Calvinism teaches that God simply decided, on His own motion, to save some sinners against their will for His own glory even as He rejected others and will ultimately destroy them in hell for His glory!

Again there are a number of Biblical objections to this doctrine! God's grace revealed in the Bible conveys just one condition for the sinner to fulfill! 

The sinner must first believe in order to be saved! He must repent and willingly choose Christ (John 3:16; Acts 16:25-30; Romans 10:14). Salvation is not automatically  and forcibly inputted on a sinner. It is received by grace though faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). 

3) LIMITED ATONEMENT

This doctrine teaches that Christ did not die for the sins of the whole world. He only died for the "Elect", a small number of sinners that, according to Calvinism, God chose from the foundation of the world to receive atonement in Christ.

The rest of the sinners who, according to Calvinism, are not on God's favored list will never come to faith in Christ no matter how the gospel is presented to them.

This doctrine agrees with the double predestination doctrine taught by sections of high Calvinism that says that God had predetermined the fate of two categories of sinners as follows: those who will be saved and will receive eternal life in Christ under a divine decree and those who will be rejected by God and will be destroyed in hell to the glory of God!

This implies that in a family, some may fall into either group and there's perfectly nothing one can do about that because God exercised His sovereignty in choosing who to save and who to reject! In short, Calvinism cannot assure the sinner of God's saving grace! 

The Bible reveals that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world! God's grace in Christ is unlimited. It can can accommodate all sinners if all were to accept the gospel. 

The Limited Atonement doctrine is decidedly a false doctrine which is not taught in the Bible. God never secretly chooses anyone outside the works of the cross! He gave all sinners a libertarian free will to accept or reject the gospel.

Those who reject the gospel will face God's judgment. This is not because God's grace was insufficient for them or that God deliberately excluded them from salvation. 

This doctrine is perhaps one of the worst in the Calvinistic perspective.

4) IRRESISTIBLE GRACE

The Irresistible Grace doctrine says that since the believer was initially dead in sin (see TULIP 1), God must have chosen him in advance and drawn him to Christ by means of a special divine, irresistible force!

While this is partly true as regards the conviction for sin, the doctrine extends further into absurdity. Here's why. Calvinism teaches that once God directs His special grace only to the sinner that He has chosen or predestined to save. This special sinner is unable to resist God's grace because his heart had been changed by God through regeneration that preceded faith. The special sinner will automatically respond to God's grace and accept Christ. This portrays God as a manipulative deity, something that Scripture does not teach!

On the converse, the sinner who, according to Calvinism, is not on God's favorite list will not receive this special grace. He will therefore not accept Christ and will perish in his sinfulness! (See Doctrines 1-3 above). 

This doctrine is false. It implies that the sinner is not responsible for his decisions or choices and that God irrationally chooses who to save and who to reject without any objective basis.

This doctrine is not supported by any passage of Scripture, not even Romans 9. 

5) PERSEVERANCE OF SAINTS

This final doctrine of the TULIP says that God will preserve those He has chosen for eternal life so that none is ultimately lost. 

This is perhaps the only doctrine that non Calvinists would recognize as consistent with Scripture. 

Wesleyan/Arminianism groups reject this doctrine. They believe that it is possible for a believer to fall away from the faith if they persist in rebellion against God. 

However, it is important to observe that believers do not persevere in the faith out of their own strength. God sustains them by His word and through the leading of His Spirit. 

I would therefore consider the first four doctrines of the TULIP Calvinism as inherently defective and inconsistent with Scripture. This inescapably renders the Calvinism philosophical systematic unbiblical and unreliable for authentic Christian instruction.


Where does this place the entire Calvinism systematic? Let the reader judge for himself!


© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020









Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Three Tests of a True Gospel Artist

THREE TESTS OF A TRUE GOSPEL ARTIST

By Ezekiel Kimosop

Someone requested for my theological opinion on the evaluation of a gospel song and the basis for its admissibility in a Christian congregation.

Allow me to say that there are no straight line template rules for determining the authenticity of a gospel song. I believe that each case should be handled based on its specific circumstances and the convictions of the believers or Christian community of context. 

For my case, I am keen on three pastoral tests which I will briefly outline below. These are what I consider as the three principal tests for the admissibility of a gospel song.   

THE THEOLOGY OF THE SONG(S)

First, the theology of the song is the eye-catcher for me. What is the artist singing about? Are the lyrics consistent with the teaching of Scripture? If the song fails the test of Scripture at this stage, I would flatly dismiss it. 

One popular 1960s UK Rock band called the Beatles used to sing what would easily pass for gospel music. The group leader John Lennon allegedly proclaimed in a March 1966 interview, during the height of their popular hits, that the group was more popular than Jesus Christ! He later apologized after receiving a barrage of criticism but the damage was already done. Sections of American Christian communities including Southern Baptists and leading radio stations boycotted their concerts. The Beatles finally fell never again to rise. 

The theology of the lyrics of a composition can be quite obscure to the ordinary person in the streets. However, when examined through the lenses of Scripture, it is possible to establish if the songs are consistent with the the teaching of Scripture. 

CHRISTIAN IDENTITY AND CONVICTIONS OF THE ARTIST

The second test concerns the identity of the gospel singer and his Christian convictions. This is a critical in projecting the spiritual personality of the singer. Their relationship with Christ and with an established Christian congregation is paramount because they affirm the singer's doctrinal orientation. It authenticates their calling in Christ and the legitimacy of their gospel ministry. Does he or she truly profess Christ? Where was the artist raised in their faith? What Christian doctrines and traditions do they subscribe to? 

If a gospel artist is not a member of any known Christian congregation, how can he purport to be a member of the body of Christ. How can his ministry inspire God's covenant people? Where does his conviction on God stand? I cannot and will not be inspired by his compositions, no matter how "Christian" they may sound. 

One popular Kenyan "gospel" group is known for their controversial hit songs that openly contradict Scripture. They are famed for composing a Sunday school hit song that implies that God's love is inconsistent. This Acapella group is reaping big from our contemporary Christian culture where anything with a Christian label appeals to people. 

In the insurance industry, we employ one critical concept in insurance policy underwriting: "Know Your Customer" or KYC. The insurers would insist on any additional details under a proposal for insurance that would more clearly reveal the nature and operations of the organization that seeks insurance protection. This includes the organization's past underwriting experience with other insurers. This will help the insurers make informed underwriting decisions that have a bearing on their financial liability obligations. This practice is informed by the prudence of established industry practice. Insurers also share critical underwriting information among themselves and this serves as an important reference point for identifying blacklisted or red-line risks in the market. 

It is the responsibility of every child of God and, by extension, any Christian congregation or community to be discerning when dealing with strangers, including Christian gospel groups with which they are not familiar. The devil is in the details. It is important to do a reference check on such groups before permitting them to perform on the church podium. 

The people of Berea engaged in godly prudence when they heard Paul and his associates preach in their city. They searched the Old Testament Scriptures at their disposal in order to verify the authenticity of Paul's gospel (Acts 17:10-15). The Bible is replete with exhortations on caution when dealing with strangers and this should apply to our evaluation of gospel artists. Paul warned Timothy not to hastily lay his hands on anyone but to keep himself pure (1 Timothy 5:22). The moral of this text is that church leaders should not hastily appoint anyone to Christian leadership positions in the church without undertaking due diligence on their moral standing. This principle is more clearly amplified by Paul in 1 Timothy 3:1-7. 

Where a gospel artist cannot demonstrate evidence of their relationship with Christ, they cannot be entitled to any benefit of doubt. 1 Corinthians 6:14-15 says "Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? 15 And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever?" (NKJV). 

MORAL LIVING AND CHRISTIAN WITNESS 

Finally, the gospel artist should demonstrate that his ministry of song is consistent with his Christian moral living. They should possess a credible testimony of a transformed Christian life, beginning with the Damascus experience. They cannot live in two worlds at the same time. They cannot proclaim Christ on Sunday and live in the shadow of darkness during the rest of the week! 

Some popular gospel artists with several "hit songs" to their credit are known to live in the underworld despite gracing church services and Christian concerts. Some of these artists eventually run away from the church and go fully secular when their true identity is unmasked. A number of leading secular artists started their singing careers at the church but were eventually lured into secular platforms where they embraced the underworld and served Mammon. 

One leading local hip-hop group in the 1990s started as a praise and worship team in a leading Evangelical church in Nairobi before they got hooked with an secular night club where they would be invited to perform to revelers during the weekdays. When their senior pastor caught wind of their misdeeds, he summoned them for a dress-down but the group left the church in defiance and went secular! They never returned to church...

Some leading gospel artists have also corrupted and sold their hit songs for commercial promotions yet the songs were originally dedicated to the gospel of Jesus Christ! Others have been hired by politicians to perform during political campaign rallies. The temptation to exchange the gospel for financial gain is difficult to resist unless one's convictions are anchored on Calvary. 

This is not to suggest that gospel artists should be perfect people. None of us is perfect before God (1 John 1:8-10). They, like us, fail God's standards on many occasions. However, a true child of God should appreciate that he or she is a steward of God's grace. They should be conscious of their calling by God to employ their skills and talents in advancing the kingdom of God. They should therefore endeavor to keep their garments free from the moral stains of this evil world. 

CONCLUSION 

Gospel artists are ministers of God who use their creativity and works of art to proclaim Christ and edify the church to the glory of God. They are no different from pastors, save perhaps for the collar distinction! They preach the word of God through their songs and inspire the congregations of God's people. They should therefore focus on their calling in Christ and refrain from any activity or conduct that brings into question their commitment to the gospel mandate. 

They should seek theological advisory on their compositions in order to avoid controversial lyrics. They should refrain from lifestyle habits that may prejudice their moral standing and bring into disrepute the body of Christ. They should stick to the narrow path irrespective of the fame or fortunes that come with the popularity of their singing ministry. They should submit to spiritual restoration where they slip by the wayside. They should demonstrate the fruits of remorse when they err. They should not persist in rebellion but should submit to pastoral counseling as appropriate. This is where a singer's moral standing and Christian witness is sharply tested. 


Shalom 



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020




In Defense of Christian Orthodoxy in Contemporary Society




IN DEFENSE OF CHRISTIAN ORTHODOXY IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY

By Ezekiel Kimosop

Christian orthodoxy is perhaps understood more in the context of outlining our beliefs and practices that concern the fundamental truths of Scripture than about our defense of those truths that inform our Christian worldview. Both contexts are significant. 

Conservative Evangelicals are traditionally known for their hesitancy in accepting "new stuff" in Christian worship and practices unless they are satisfied that they are consistent with the teaching of Scripture. This prudence was first witnessed in the Berea Christian community. The Bereans demonstrated unparalleled diligence in verifying the faithfulness of Paul's preaching with the teaching of the Old Testament Scripture. Luke reports in Acts 17:11 that "...they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so."

The Bible commends this prudence in other sections of Scripture, notably 2 Timothy 2:15; 3:14-15. Nothing perhaps underscores the validity of this prudence than the concoction that consolidates Christianity and contemporary lifestyle. 

Picture this....My encounter with the popular Jerusalema rendition accorded me an opportunity to inquire into its faithfulness to the teachings of Scripture. I must admit that this was not an easy exercise. I had to juggle between playing and pausing the video song to catch the English translation before writing my commentary. Thankfully a brother sent me the full English translation. I agree with those who say that the African gospel scene is quickly getting swallowed up by secularism and may finally be lost in its muddle. 

When I finally posted my commentary on Jerusalema song on a certain social media page that hosts both believers and secular people, one guy who at one point had confessed in the same page that he was a born again Christian was apparently irked by my critical commentary. He quickly scolded me on the page, saying [verbatim quote]:

"Mtumishi....I respect your analysis above....but the cardinal duty of a clergy is to fight sins and sinners in society.....less interference with a song that causes happiness especially at these moments of sorrowness and pandemics. Pse walk up and enjoy the song with your family and congregation."

His reaction did not surprise me though. I have come across dozens others of this sort on social media. It aptly conveyed the growing influence of the secularist worldview that has invaded our church pews! 

Yes, I agree with those who rightly observe that we have lost the prudence in evaluating Christian music and have thrown our diligence to the wind! The Jerusalema song is just one among many popular lyrics that contemporary Christianity easily passes for Bible centered gospel renditions. This is not to suggest that the song is ungodly per se. I simply needed to understand its theological message. 

You will perhaps recall the Kenyan hit song that appears to suggest that God loves us more today than he did yesterday! The song sounds "gospel" in every conceivable manner until one narrows down on its lyrics with a critical eye. Why else would it be classified as a top gospel hit? It was soon adopted as a popular Sunday school rhyme in churches where little kids got to learn that Jesus' love for them grows over time...or does it....hmmm. By declaring that God's love is variable, the composers appear to openly misrepresent the nature of God's love for His covenant people that the Bible says endures forever (Psalm 136).  

But who cares?

Someone argued that we should refrain from reading too much into nothing.... really? How far are we prepared to go in watering down Biblical truths to appease the world? Gospel music is just one of the many platforms that reveal our rapidly shifting cultural worldview in contemporary Christianity. Another concept is the celebration of secular calendar events in the Christian community including 14th February, the day dedicated to St Valentino of Rome. I have addressed this issue elsewhere in this website blog. 

WORRYING TRENDS IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY

Away from gospel music, there are more glaring indicators that reveal that global Christianity has been shifting from its centre-pole over the centuries. One of my theological courses in seminary was dedicated to the study of World Christianity in historical and contemporary contexts. It examines the history and movement of Christianity across the globe through the ages since the Early Church period. The statistics are startling. Global Christianity has been exponentially shifting to the global South even as its original cradle in Europe is increasingly being reduced to a pale shadow of its former self!

One might perhaps be surprised to learn that Europe now accounts for less than a quarter of world Christians and this number is sharply declining as secularism and atheism takes its toll on this traditional bastion of global Christianity. European Christianity is increasingly turning into a private religion. Cathedrals have been converted to supermarkets and entertainment joints, thanks to the advance of a churchless society.   

According to the Pew Report (2010), out of the estimated 2 billion global Christians today, European Christians account for only 26%. This is a sharp decline from 70% since 1910! It is further reported that 37% of Christians are now found in the Americas [comprising North America and Latin America] while 24% live in Sub-Saharan Africa. One in eight Christians (13%) lives in Asia and the Pacific including the Oceania.

What went wrong with European Christianity? Only two words aptly describe its demise: modernism and secularism. It is estimated that African Christianity will account for a sizable proportion of global Christianity in the next few decades given its rapid growth which is one of the highest in the world.

Sadly, global Christianity is now moving into a dispensation that theologians have classified as "post-truth"  or "post-Christian" era in which the sanctity and authority of Scripture is questioned, defied and openly rejected and Christian orthodoxy or traditionalism is attacked. Individualism and relativism is now the ruling norm for large sections of contemporary Christianity. 

CONCLUSION

This secularism that was previously identified Christian societies in America and Europe is rapidly catching up in the global south. Church Cathedrals in major European towns are now being converted into bars and shopping malls, thanks to the lost Christian heritage. It may perhaps be only a matter of time before this culture overruns the global south (Third World) unless radical efforts are made to shore up Christian orthodoxy in this region.

Once a Christian society neglects the fundamentals of its faith and is less concerned about its doctrinal boundaries, it slips into secularism and its pristine religious identity is irretrievably lost. If we cannot tell the difference between a gospel song and a secular rendition, we cannot possibly distinguish between Biblical truth and error or between genuine Christian practices and secular lifestyles. 

It is the duty of every standing Christian to defend the faith that was once for all delivered to us (Jude 1:3). This comes at a cost. One will be scolded, chided, isolated and assigned pharisaical labels for championing or defending Christian orthodoxy where it matters.

Are you willing to stand out and be counted? 


Shalom



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020



Tuesday, October 6, 2020

John 6:44 Does Not Support Calvinism

JOHN 6:44 DOES NOT SUPPORT CALVINISM

By Ezekiel Kimosop

Calvinists often quote John 6:44 out of its passage context and make it a proof text [alongside a host of others] in support of their doctrine of Irresistable Grace which, in my view, is not supported by Scripture. 

Notice the two conditional phrases in John 6:47-51 which Calvinists conveniently ignore. They fall into the passage of context of John 6:41-59 in which John 6:44 lies.

Let's examine them below: 

1) Jesus says "He who believes in me has everlasting life" (John 6:47)  There's an obligation on the sinner who hears the gospel proclaimed. They MUST believe in Christ as a precondition for receiving eternal life. There are no favourites for whom God's grace is reserved! All sinners stand on equal footing, having fallen under Adam and deserving of God's condemnation. 

2) Jesus says "If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever" (John 6:51). Again a conditional phrase is given. The eating is a metaphoric reference to exercising faith in Christ. This is a responsibility that falls on the sinner who, having heard the gospel proclaimed and is convicted of his sinful condemnation, submits to Christ by the exercise of faith. 

There are dozens of other passages of Scripture that affirm human responsibility for responding to God's grace and which Calvinism overlooks. My view is that it is nowhere taught or implied in Scripture that God's sovereignty is diminished or His glory taken away if a sinner must accept or reject the gospel. If anything, it is God's design for salvation that the sinner must exercise his liberty and hence take responsibility for his free will choice.

John 12:32-33 says "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.” 33 This He said, signifying by what death He would die."

This Scripture teaches that salvation is available to ALL who believe the gospel message and submit to Christ (cf. John 3:16; Romans 10:14). 

Christ is lifted up through the faithful proclamation of the gospel to the sinful world.

John 12:32-33 further affirms the unlimited atonement in Christ Jesus that God has made available to ALL men in all ages since Calvary without any discrimination whatsoever. 

Those who reject Christ or His message of redemption are responsible for their decisions and for this reason, God will judge them (Revelation 20:7-15). My view is that salvation involves God's grace 100% and Man's responsibility 100%. Neither contradicts the other and the two are not mutually exclusive!

Any doctrine that denies this truth violates the express teaching of Scripture and misrepresents the mind of God.



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020



Monday, October 5, 2020

The Hope of Resurrection in Christ

THE HOPE OF RESURRECTION IN CHRIST

By Ezekiel Kimosop

What happens if a believer dies? Shall we ever see them again? This is one of the many questions that confront those who grieve over their loved ones who have passed on. 

The Bible has a clear answer to this question.

Yes, every believer in Christ has the hope of resurrection embedded in their life and faith. This is not merely an abstract thought but a foundational truth taught in Scripture. Christ rose from the dead as evidence that those who die in Christ shall also be raised by God in the resurrection of saints (1 Corinthians 15:20-23).

Scripture further proclaims that believers have been sealed by the Holy Spirit for the day of redemption (Ephesians 4:30). No matter what prevails in this world, none of them shall be lost, not even in death.

The Bible teaches that when Christ shall appear to take away His Church, the dead in Christ shall rise first and those who are alive at His coming and otherwise believe in Christ shall be transformed at the twinkling of an eye and all the saints shall meet the Lord in the air. They shall eternally abide in His divine presence forever (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18). 

Meanwhile, those who sleep in Christ have rested from their works, having fulfilled God's purposes on earth. Their souls are preserved in the presence of God as they await the resurrection (2 Timothy 4:7-8).

Those of us who have lost our loved ones who believed in Jesus Christ have every reason to be encouraged by these words of comfort found in Scripture. The dead in Christ are therefore not lost. They are simply awaiting the sound of the final trumpet of God which shall trigger the rapture.

This is essentially what separates believers from the people of this world, the children of disobedience who are under the command and control of Satan (Ephesians 2:2, 5:6; Colossians 3:6). They have no hope of resurrection because they are blinded in their rebellion against God.

Let us therefore rejoice in this hope and glorify God for what Christ has accomplished for us at Calvary through His finished works of the cross.

Let us continually proclaim His redemption hope to the dying world around us through the gospel so that God may open their eyes to this truth and save them too while the window of opportunity for God's grace remains open.

Christ alone is our hope of glory and His victory over death is our eternal guarantee that we too shall be raised to be with Him and to reign with Him forever.

Do you have this hope in you?

Shalom.



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020




Wednesday, September 30, 2020

What Does it Mean that Believers are Partakers of the Divine Nature?

 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE PARTAKERS OF THE DIVINE NATURE? 


By Ezekiel Kimosop

2 Peter 1:2-3 says "Grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord, 3 as His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, 4 by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust" (NKJV).

These opening verses are part of the writer's salutation to his audience that he describes in 1:1 as "...those who have obtained like precious faith with us by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ." 

This is descriptive of believers in general but the context of the Letter suggests that Peter was focused on a particular Christian community.

If we consider that this Letter follows the tradition in 1 Peter, we can conclude that it may have been addressed to "the pilgrims of the dispersion", a reference to Jerusalem believers who were facing severe persecution under Herod for their faith in Christ and were dispersed during the early period of the New Testament Church (cf Acts 12:1-4; 1 Peter 1:1). 

Now back to our analysis.

My view is that the salutation statement in 2 Peter 1:2-3 is therefore simply a broad one. It recognizes that the new life that believers have received in Christ and the hope of glory for the life come (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:17) as part of what makes a Christian community.

This encouragement is instructive of the circumstances that Peter addressed under his first Letter. He is now writing to  the recipient to primarily warn them about the snare of false teachers (2 Peter 1:16-21, 2:1-22) and to encourage believers to remain steadfast in their faith (2 Peter 3). 

McLaren's Exposition Commentary considers the statement "partakers in the divine nature" in 2 Peter 1:4 as a portrayal of Christ's indwelling in the believers by His Spirit. I agree with this observation. It is theologically consistent with the teaching of Scripture concerning God's revelation, redemption and fellowship with His saints.

Sadly, I have come across some Christian traditions [especially sections of the charismatic movement] whose interpretation of the statement implies that believers share in divinity. They read this Scripture together with Psalm 82:6 which they lift out of its passage context to teach what the Bible never contemplates.This hermeneutical approach to Scripture is manifestly false and misleading to the reader.

Christ's indwelling in the life of the believer does not result in an investiture of the divine nature in us. It also doesn't qualify us to become "gods" as some wrongly interpret Psalm 82:6 to mean.

God's divine attributes are incommunicable and cannot therefore be shared with His creatures. 

At no time in this life or in the life to come shall believers share in the essence of God's divine nature. We remain God's children or followers who have been redeemed by God's grace in Christ and have been sealed by the Holy Spirit for the day of redemption (Ephesians 4:30).


© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020

Saturday, September 19, 2020

Handling Resistance to God's Work - Lessons in Ezra 4:1-5

HANDLING RESISTANCE TO GOD’S WORK – EZRA 4:1-5

By Ezekiel Kimosop

In Ezra 4, we are introduced to circumstances that brought conflict and subsequent stalemate on the Temple reconstruction work. We shall examine the first five verses in this exposition and conclude with practical moral lessons that apply to the religious life of a Christian community.

We learn from the opening verse of Ezra 4:1 that some of the adversaries of Israel heard that the Jewish returnees were reconstructing the Temple at Jerusalem. It is not immediately clear if they lived within the vicinity of Jerusalem or had traveled from Northern Israel which is identified as their native settlement.

These unnamed enemies of God's people came up with a two pronged approach. First they tactfully offered to be enjoined in the works under the guise that they too worshipped the God of Israel and had “sacrificed to Him since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assyria, who brought us here” (Ezra 4:2, NKJV).  

The second strategy was to frustrate the works if the Jews failed to cooperate with them. 

Their statement recorded in Ezra 4:2 was a flat lie. It is nothing short of a charm offensive intended to convince the returnees that they were blessed with godly neighbours! Sadly, these adversaries were not part of God's covenant people. Even if, for argument sake, they happen to have been, two questions beg for answers. 

First, if they truly served the God of Israel,  why had they not reconstructed the Temple in the preceding 50 years since the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC? 

Secondly, what was now motivating their interest at this point in time, if not sheer jealousy and illwill?

Historical sources attest to the fact that the Jerusalem Temple was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC after which he carried the temple treasures to Babylon where he placed them in the house of his gods (Ezra 1:7-11).

Again, the mention of Assyria as the kingdom that settled the adversaries is evidence that their ancestors were originally settled in Northern Israel by Sargon II or his successor after the fall of Samaria to the Assyrians in 722 BC. They had therefore surreptitiously crossed into Judah from Samaria during the long captivity period.

Zerubbabel’s response recorded in Ezra 4:3 was informed by godly wisdom. He and the leaders rightly discerned the mischief of these adversaries and flatly rejected their offer for joint workmanship. There was nothing to suggest that these heathen people had embraced Judaism or even honored the God of Israel. They were therefore up to no good.  Notice the parallel between this incident and the story in Nehemiah 4 relating to the notorious pair, Tobias and Sanballat, who scorned and laughed off the works instituted by Nehemiah under the reign of Darius. 

The emphatic response by Zerubbabel in the Ezra case is instructive: “You may do nothing with us to build a house for our God; but we alone will build to the Lord God of Israel, as King Cyrus the king of Persia has commanded us.” (Ezra 4:3). 

The mandate for the temple works was from God. He had stirred up and commanded Cyrus, the Persian king, to facilitate it. This assignment was specifically and exclusively intended for the returnees whom God had chosen for the purpose and no help was contemplated from unrelated parties. 

There are responsibilities that God assigns to specific people and only those who have been called to that service should discharge that mandate. Those who have no such calling should keep off or otherwise face God's judgment.

In Ezra 4:4, the adversaries, having realized that they were unwelcome, decided to resort to their plan B. They threatened and discouraged God's people with the intention of stalling the works. They temporarily succeeded in their schemes.

This regrettable scenario was sustained through the reigns of Cyrus to Darius. It is instructive that both imperial monarchs were sympathetic to the reconstruction works but for unknown reasons, word either never reached them or some evil advisers colluded with the adversaries of Israel to conceal the status of events in Judah.

Bible scholars estimate that the reigns of Cyrus and Darius stretched through 559 BC – 486 BC. This implies that the resistance to the Temple works possibly continued until the reign of Artaxerxes (Xerxes I) who permanently stopped the works during his 20 year reign between 485-465BC. He was possibly the monarch mentioned under the correspondence in Ezra 4:7-23.

We also learn from Haggai 2 that the temple work was finally completed under Darius the Great whose reign is estimated to fall between 522-486 BC.

God’s call by Haggai came approximately 520 BC, about 18 years after the first set of returnees led by Zerubbabel arrived in Judah and managed to build the altar but did not progress further because of the opposition from the Canaanite people. The period described in Haggai therefore falls into the longer period covered under the Book of Ezra. 

MORAL LESSONS FROM THE PASSAGE

We can draw a number of moral lessons from this passage. I have identified a few which I hope would inspire the reader in dealing with external conflicts that are introduced into ministry by people who are not committed to the things of God.

A)  Not all who name the name of God are necessarily true followers of Jesus Christ. This is not to suggest that those who hold conflicting views in congregational leadership are necessarily adversaries from Satan! We should be specifically concerned about people who have no calling from God but yet purport to speak His mind. 

Some of these evil people may have been planted by the enemy in the midst of God’s people with the objective of frustrating ministry. Only the discerning and spiritual in the midst of God's people will identify these imposters (cf. Matthew 13:24-30; Ephesians 4:14-15). 

Acts 20:28-31 says "Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears."

1 Timothy 5:22 warns Christian leaders never to hurriedly lay hands on [or appoint] anyone into ministry positions lest they partake in their sins. 

It is important to satisfy the prudence of the church leaders whenever a critical ministry assignment or appointment is desired so that only those who have the true calling can be identified. We should not affirm strangers in a congregation without sufficient background reference.

Jesus taught in Matthew 7:21-23 saying, “Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!” (NKJV).  

Neighborhood acquittance or blood relationship are not of themselves a ticket to communion in Christian ministry. Only those who know Christ and satisfy the requirements of Acts 6:3; 1 Timothy 3:1-13 and other relevant passages of Scripture should be considered for ministry duties.

B)  Believers are a distinct community of God’s people who are spiritually separated from the people of this sinful world. They have no communion with those outside the body of Christ. 2 Peter 2:9 says “But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light”. 

We are to evangelize the lost and not merely assimilate them among us!

C)  It is the responsibility of God’s covenant people to use their resources, skills and opportunities to advance the work of God. This mandate cannot be delegated or assigned to people who are outside God’s covenant community. I am aware that our African "ujamaa" culture values the "harambee" or socio-communal support for community programs. 

Many church sanctuaries have been constructed with the support of the political class. This is not the same thing as Christian ministry service [even though it can be understood that way]. The responsibility for Christian ministry squarely falls on the shoulders of the Christian community and its leadership. This will never be delegated to the people of the world.

D)  We should not be surprised or discouraged by opposition to God’s work.  Satan will always send his agents to interfere with the work of God. The Bible is replete with illustrations on the suffering and affliction of God’s people in the hands of their adversaries both from within and without the Church. However, God never abandons His true people through all ages of human civilization, even under the fiercest persecution! His divine hand powerfully weaves through our circumstances of life and ultimately breaks the enemy barriers in the end.

Jesus said in Luke 6:22-23, " Blessed are you when men hate you, 

And when they exclude you,

    And revile you, and cast out your name as evil,

    For the Son of Man’s sake.

Rejoice in that day and leap for joy!

    For indeed your reward is great in heaven,

    For in like manner their fathers did to the prophets" (NKJV).

E)   No matter how long the enemy stands in the way of God's work, God's kingdom will always be advanced by those who courageously stand out to be counted in serving God.  God’s purposes will ultimately be achieved through them. 

Are you passing through fierce opposition from the enemy camp?

Be encouraged. Greater is He [Christ] that is in us [by His Spirit] than he [Satan] that is in the world (1John 4:4).



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020



Wednesday, September 9, 2020

Stirred into Action - Lessons in Ezra 1:5-11


 STIRRED TO ACTION: LESSONS IN EZRA 1:5-11

By Ezekiel Kimosop

In our previous study of Ezra 1:1-4, we learned about God's command to Cyrus king of Persia during the first year of his reign that he should build the Temple at Jerusalem. Cyrus was used by God to facilitate and provide logistical support for a section of Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple. 

In Ezra 1:5-11, we continue to follow the sequence of events following God's command to the Persian ruler. God stirred up the civil and religious leaders of the exiles of Judah and they arose and focused their energies on the Temple reconstruction effort (Ezra1:5-6). God also stirred up the neighbors of the exiles to support them with resources such as silver, gold and livestock. 

Notice that Judah and Benjamin constituted the southern kingdom of Judah. The northern kingdom of Israel, also referred to as Samaria, and which comprised the rest of the twelve tribes of Israel, completely disappeared from the ancient world, never to arise again. It fell to Sargon II in 722 BC.

God therefore restricted His dealings to the people of Judah because of His covenant promise to David that He would raise a great ruler in the latter days so that his throne will be established forever (2 Samuel 7:1-17). 

Some of the Jewish people signed up for the first batch of returnees in 538 BC and were determined to obey the command to reconstruct the temple at Jerusalem. They were led by Zerubbabel. Their experience in Judah is reported in the Book of Haggai.

Another set of returnees led by Ezra and Nehemiah, set out for Judah in 458 BC and 444 BC, respectively. We shall later learn about their achievements and challenges.

God also caused Cyrus to release the Temple treasures that had been captured by his predecessor, king Nebuchadnezzar during the fall of Jerusalem to Babylon in 586 BC. The temple treasures appeared to have been well preserved in the temple of the Babylonian deities.

A careful inventory was taken on the treasures before they were handed over to Sheshbazzer, who was the imperial governor of Judah at the time (Ezra1:7-11). Bible scholars say that the name "Shashbazzer" was a Persian (or Babylonian) name for Zerubabbel son of Shealtiel who is mentioned in the Book of Haggai. He is also listed in the lineage of Christ (Luke 3:27). 

It was a common practice among ancient Middle Eastern kingdoms to change names of captives. This is affirmed in the Book of Daniel where the three Hebrew young men were given Babylonian names (Daniel 1:6-7).

The temple treasures may have been taken back to Judah by the first batch of returnees under Zerubbabel who were permitted by Cyrus to return to Jerusalem for the temple reconstruction. 

APPLICATION

What moral lessons can we draw from our study of this passage?

First, God quickens and calls people of various cadres into His service. We should all respond to the call of God in whatever circumstances, knowing that we would be serving His purposes in our time. 

Our skills, aptitudes and position of influence may be a basis for Christian service.

Secondly, there's power in coordination and teamwork in God's kingdom. When God's people are united for a common purpose, they accomplish much. 

Thirdly, there's no dispensation in which God's dealing with His people can fail. No matter what circumstances prevail around us, God actively interacts with His covenant people and draws them to Himself. They are His vessels of service (1 Timothy 2:17-21); a special people belonging to God (1 Peter 2:9).

Finally, we learn that God keeps His promises. He promised to return His people back to Judah after the period of their dispersion is accomplished. That's practically what happened during the period described by the Books of Ezra, Nehemiah and Haggai. 

This reminds us that the soon return of Christ is a certainty anchored in God's promises in Scripture (1 Thessalonians 4 13-18). Those who are faithful to Christ will be taken away by Christ to be eternally in the presence of God. 

Do you sense the call of God relating to a particular of service? Arise and serve. 



© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020


Monday, September 7, 2020

Lessons in Christian Reconciliation in Philemon

 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CHRISTIAN FORGIVENESS AND RECONCILIATION


By Ezekiel Kimosop

The letter of Philemon is one of the shortest Letters of the New Testament Scripture. 

It is centred on Paul's reconciliation effort under a domestic conflict pitting Philemon, one of his converts who happened to be a close ministry associate and Christian elder in the Church of Colossae on the one part and his runaway slave Onesimus on the other.

Onesimus ran away from his master Philemon under undisclosed circumstances and traveled a whopping 1200 miles to Rome to meet Paul. He had possibly stolen from his master or was unfaithful in some other serious way. 

Onesimus was aware of the consequences of his unfaithfulness. In ancient Europe, slaves could be severely punished by their masters if they violated their obligations to their masters. They were personal property with little or no rights. It is estimated that nine in every ten people in first century Europe and Asia Minor were slaves!

Onesimus was familiar with the apostle Paul because his missionary journeys led him to Colossae where he founded the Colossian church and often lodged at Philemon's place (cf. Philemon 1:20-21).

Paul was later arrested and locked up in a Roman prison for preaching the Gospel. There's no evidence from the letter that Onesmus was imprisoned for his crime.

Having met Paul, and perhaps shared his problems with him, Onesimus was transformed by the Gospel that Paul proclaimed to him and he accepted Christ. 

This letter also confirms that Paul had some degree of liberty in prison. He could receive visitors and send letters to the churches. 

Paul decided to commend Onesimus back to his master Philemon, asking him to accept Onesimus now that he was remorseful and reformed in heart and would be useful to him.

We cannot tell for sure if Philemon took back his runaway slave but given Onesimus' subsequent mention elsewhere alongside Christian leaders (Colossians 4:9) (assuming it was the same Onesimus) and his special relationship with Paul, we are led to believe that Paul's plea to Philemon was heeded. 

Paul looked forward to his freedom and asked Philemon to prepare him a place to lodge. He possibly intended to follow up on the issue or was simply looking forward to passing by Colossae to check on the brethren there on his way to Ephesus which was 100 miles from Colossae. 

Onesimus was possibly the bearer of both  the Letter of Philemon and the Letter to the Colossians. Some scholars say Onesimus went on to serve as a Christian elder and Bishop in Ephesus long after Paul was matyred. 

What can we learn from the Letter of Philemon?

This short letter speaks to Christian forgiveness and reconciliation in the light of what God in Christ accomplished for us at the cross. Forgiveness renews relationships, heals spiritual and emotional wounds and advances the Gospel. 

It also undecores our Christian responsibility in reconciling men to God on Christ's behalf and to one another in Christ. The Bible says in 2 Corinthians 5:20 "Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God."


Shalom.


© Ezekiel Kimosop 2020